Nathalie Gettliffe to be freed

Since I am one of the few English journalists to take any interest in the Nathalie Gettliffe case - for which I offer no apology - I should briefly note the news that she is finally to be freed tomorrow. A French court has agreed to her provisional liberty, effectively parole, without requiring her to complete the six further months of imprisonment to which she remained liable when sentenced in Canada last month. She had pleaded guilty to abducting two of her own children in a bitter custody battle. This second bit of commonsense in a sad and tangled saga (the first being a French court's gesture in granting her some freedom during the festive period) is to be welcomed. Ironically, had Gettliffe not chosen to be repatriated just before Christmas, she would by now already be free, according to my understanding of procedures in British Columbia. But is there any provision in Canadian penal practice for the sort of Christmas leave for which she qualified in France? If not, she was probably better off being with the other half of her family then, even though it meant having to spend another few days in prison pending today's decision. Of course, we have not heard the end of this affair. But I will stick to my earlier decision and comment only when, as now, there are significant developments. This blog is not a news agency, as I have said before, and I have not been required to write news articles for anyone about an affair that was deemed a little too foreign for British readers.

That is the main reason why I have felt perfectly at liberty to express an opinion, intolerable as this may have seemed to some.

Labels: abduction, British Columbia, Canada, France, jail, Nathalie Gettliffe