When I posted an item in June about the wretched case of Genarlow Wilson in the southern American state of Georgia, I half expected to be writing a follow up within days.
Surely the grotesque misjustice that had seen him jailed for 10 years for consensual oral sex, at 17, with a girl aged 15 would quickly be put right and the young man freed.
It wasn't. They do things their way in Georgia.
Instead, it has taken the Georgia Supreme Court four-and-a-half months since a judge ruled that the original sentence represented a "grave miscarriage of justice" to confirm that this decision, not a hard one to understand, should translate into Wilson's release.
The fact that it didn't, wilfully prolonging Wilson's agony, is just another indictment of American justice in action.
While I am delighted that he is at last free to rebuild his life, I cannot help wondering what goes on in the minds of the dissenting judges in what was a close-run thing: only by 4-3 did the court find that Wilson had been subjected to "cruel and unusual punishment".
Three members of the panel were clearly content to bring further disgrace on their state, and by extension America, by voting to continue that cruelty until the savage sentence had run its course.
Recent Comments