Attacking the Beatles is a little like having a go at the Queen Mother used to be. Much-loved, untouchable national institutions and all that.
This weekend, France's golden oldies station, Nostalgie, which seems to have the shortest playlist of any station I have come across, has been dipping liberally into the package. There was even a pre-recorded clip of Paul McCartney saying something like: "Hi, this is Paul on (cue for exaggerated French accent) Nostalgie." The Beatles and Nostalgie were made for each other.
So everyone's happy? Well, as fans form an orderly queue for mortgages to buy the Fab Four's remastered, 16-album back catalogue - the finance is necessary because it will set you back £170, or a whacking 210 euros if you do your shopping in France - let's remember that some people didn't actually like the Beatles.
Take Jeremy Robson, last seen in these parts when writing about the wartime loss of an RAF Lancaster in Burgundy.
In quiet moments at the Blackcats list, a superior e-mail forum for thinking fans of Sunderland AFC, Jeremy - a Murton lad now living in Canada - gets discussions going on extra-curricular matters. Music is a popular choice.
Our tastes do not really coincide. From time to time, I gingerly mention my folkie artists in these discussions but the singers and musicians I admire would be unknown to most of those subscribing to the list (though a reference by me to Fairport Convention the other day did get someone simpering about the late Sandy Denny's glorious song, Who Knows Where The Time Goes?)
On the Beatles, Jeremy is adamant, if uncharacteristically defensive to start with: "I don't want to upset anyone. I also realise I am in a minority but is there anyone out there who, like me, just absolutely hates the Beatles?"
I repeat the question here because I have belatedly realised that Jeremy sent it in error to me instead of the Blackcats list.
And my answer?
No, I never hated them. In their time, I thought them magnificent. I even traded for a short time on the belief among a few short-sighted lasses in Shildon, County Durham that with my long hair - yes, I had hair then - I looked a little like Paul.
I agree however, with a Guardian review in which Tim de Lisle said that as the singles got stronger and stronger, the albums broadly got worse. And I won't be splashing out on the re-issues. I would also say that while the Beatles generally created the better songs, the Rolling Stones were the more exciting band by a mile. What do others think?
And what, for that matter, do you think of the Fleet Foxes, about whom Jeremy and others have been raving of late?
Recent Comments